🔗 Share this article

T relief brought by the ceasefire in Gaza is immense. In Israel, the freeing of captives held alive has sparked widespread elation. Throughout Gaza and the West Bank, festivities have commenced as as many as 2,000 Palestinian inmates are being freed – though anguish remains due to ambiguity about who is being freed and their eventual placements. Throughout Gaza's northern regions, civilians can finally return to dig through rubble for the bodies of an estimated 10,000 those who have disappeared.

Ceasefire Emergence Despite Previous Doubts

Just three weeks ago, the chance of a ceasefire appeared remote. But it has come into force, and on Monday Donald Trump journeyed from Jerusalem, where he was cheered in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he attended a high-powered diplomatic gathering of over 20 world leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. The plan for peace launched at that summit is due to be continued at a assembly in the UK. The US president, acting with international partners, did make this deal happen – regardless of, not due to, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Aspirations for Sovereignty Tempered by Past Precedents

Aspirations that the deal signifies the opening phase toward Palestinian statehood are reasonable – but, considering historical precedent, somewhat optimistic. It provides no definite route to independence for Palestinians and risks separating, for the near term, Gaza from the West Bank. Additionally the utter devastation this war has produced. The omission of any timeframe for Palestinian autonomy in Mr Trump’s plan undermines vainglorious references, in his Knesset speech, to the “historic dawn” of a “era of prosperity”.

The American leader was unable to refrain from dividing and individualizing the deal in his speech.

In a time of respite – with the freeing of captives, ceasefire and renewal of aid – he chose to recast it as a morality play in which he solely reinstated Israel’s honor after alleged disloyalty by former US presidents Obama and Biden. Notwithstanding the Biden administration twelve months prior having attempted a similar deal: a cessation of hostilities connected with aid delivery and ultimate diplomatic discussions.

Substantive Control Essential for Authentic Resolution

A initiative that refuses one side substantive control is incapable of delivering sustainable agreement. The halt in hostilities and relief shipments are to be welcomed. But this is not currently policy development. Without mechanisms securing Palestinian engagement and authority over their own organizations, any deal endangers cementing oppression under the language of peace.

Relief Imperatives and Rebuilding Obstacles

Gaza’s people desperately need humanitarian aid – and nutrition and medication must be the first priority. But restoration cannot wait. Among 60 million tonnes of debris, Palestinians need assistance repairing residences, educational facilities, healthcare facilities, religious buildings and other institutions shattered by Israel’s invasion. For Gaza’s interim government to thrive, financial support must flow quickly and security gaps be filled.

Similar to a great deal of Mr Trump’s resolution initiative, references to an multinational security contingent and a proposed “diplomatic committee” are worryingly ambiguous.

Global Backing and Prospective Outcomes

Strong international support for the Palestinian Authority, allowing it to take over from Hamas, is likely the most promising possibility. The tremendous pain of the past two years means the humanitarian imperative for a settlement to the conflict is arguably more urgent than ever. But although the ceasefire, the repatriation of the hostages and vow by Hamas to “demilitarise” Gaza should be accepted as positive steps, Mr Trump’s record offers minimal cause to have faith he will deliver – or feel bound to endeavor. Temporary ease does not imply that the prospect of a Palestinian state has been moved nearer.